Why Samskrit?

This entry was posted by l, j F, Y
Read the rest of this entry »

Author: Smt. Venetia Ansell (http://venetiaansell.wordpress.com)

In the 19th century, Thomas Babington Macaulay instigated a major change in the Indian education system.  Macaulay famously wanted to create “a class of persons, Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect” and sought to do this by championing English as the medium of instruction in place of the traditional Sanskrit-based education.  Leaving aside the heated debate over ‘Macaulay’s children’, no one can deny that English has become the lingua franca in India not just for education but for much of everyday life.

As Macaulay realised, language is central to any culture.  Not only does it provide continuity, connecting diverse peoples across time and space, but it also moulds and is moulded by that culture. And, in spite of the many languages, old and modern, that India has spawned, it is Sanskrit that stands tall behind almost all of them. Sanskrit is, as it were, the linguistic and literary fabric that stretches the length and breadth of India.  India without Sanskrit would not be India.

Thanks in part to Macaulay, Sanskrit has withered as English has flourished.  The language, and all it stands for, now faces two related risks.

There is a growing reliance on translations into modern Indian languages, and particularly English.  Translating Sanskrit texts is a start, and certainly helps make them more accessible, but it is hardly a solution. A children’s version of the Pancatantra in English, Hindi or Kannada is undoubtedly a good thing but Ayurvedic doctors depending on English translations of the major medical treatises  is not.  In addition, a vast amount of material is lying in lakhs upon lakhs of undiscovered, undeciphered, untranslated and unpublished manuscripts throughout the country.  India needs more people who can read the Gita themselves rather than yet another translation of the text.

The second danger is that Sanskrit becomes just one more dead language.  In the West, Sanskrit thrives in the world’s best universities with brilliant scholars and plenty of funding (well, relatively speaking).  But if Sanskrit is to avoid the fate of ancient Greek, which prospers in the stone colonnades of Oxbridge colleges but is no better than a corpse to the rest of the world, it cannot exist solely as a source of dry academic study.  Sanskrit has outlived its European sisters, Latin and Greek, by many centuries because it has continued to be used not just for religion and government – as Latin was for many years – but also for teaching, scholarly discussions, new compositions, fresh commentaries on old works, the media and of course everyday conversation.   If Sanskrit is to live on, it must be spoken and written as well as read and heard.  People need to actively engage with Sanskrit.

Many of Sanskrit’s most enthusiastic supporters are NRIs, living abroad or just returned; you never appreciate something until you’ve lost it.  In another generation or so, metropolitan Indians growing up in English-as-a-first-language households may well see the value of Sanskrit and the passport it provides to their cultural heritage.  The irony is that by that stage they will struggle with the language as much as the many Westerners who – attracted by yoga, ayurveda, vedanta and even Panini – now learn Sanskrit.  And in the meantime, who knows how many manuscripts will have succumbed to leaks, insects, fire and old age, and how many pandits will have taken their knowledge, passed down for hundreds of years, with them to the funeral pyre.

5 Responses to “Why Samskrit?”

  1. namaste! My name’s Daniel, I belong to a community of Krsna devotees in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and I recently started studying samskrta after purchasing the firt level of the correspondence course from Samskrta Bharati. I was asked to create a pamphel to promote a short course on Sanskrit, I would appreciate any ideas you can provide.
    Mr Krishnaswami is right in saying that there are no good methods, Samskrta Bharati course is great and very didactic but there’s still a lot of room for improvement, there are some parts that lack explanation, and besides, this course seems to be one of the very few ones that are really pedagogically well designed. Hence the great need of someone with both didactic knowledge and Sanskrit knowledge to develop such a course. I have didactis knowledge, it would be good to form a group to start developing a course that can reach everyone. Reciting stotras is not motivational for most people, any language like English is learn in a couple of years, why not lear spoken sanskrit and go from there? The thing is that usually courses offer list of vocabulary to be memorized, that’s not the way!! Language must be in context, and graduated from easier to more difficult, language is to communicate, there’s the need of a communicative course in sanskrit.
    I wish I could create the basis to establish a community of samskrta lovers here in Argentina!

1 3 4 5

Leave a Reply